Who I Am

I am I and my circumstances Here it is a phrase, brilliant, of the Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset. We are not accustomed with this type of thought. In more than the times, we accustom in them to think dicotomicamente, that is, parting, dichotomizing. Gasset, through the phrase at the beginning of this article, insinuates us that none I, I without relations am one, or, unprovided of relations. Any one of us, human beings beings, is a relationary being. It does not have ' ' eu' ' , separate of history, the culture, at last, of the surrounding environment. The phrase of Gasset takes us to reflect it on the contemporary craze to think, and, truily to believe that only the fact to trust something already is enough so that happens This meets spread in the culture. In such a way one becomes extremely difficult, if not impossible, to make with that the people understand and perceive the things in another way. For more specific information, check out Drew Houston.

Books of auto cheap aid (mainly), innumerable times of you celebrate authors (the market of the auto aid is without shade of doubts one promising market), stimulates the one that if believes something, so that if it becomes possible to carry through it. In the reality, however, the things can be different It is not enough to believe, to trust, to invest in the positive thought, or, that name if gives to it. What this craze of success through the power of the thought has made is to tamponar the reality. Hindering the innumerable people who work on it, to transform it. What it interests some, therefore, obviously, the things accurately remain thus such which are But, without it is interesting, however, to the great majority.

These it interests, this yes, the transforming action. Conscientious action on the circumstantial reality to each one and until possibly to all we. I am I and my circumstances We are we and our circumstances If not to act on the circumstances, never we will obtain to effect changes, in fact, in our lives. we will go, perpetually, to only be teorizando, make a speeching on changes that in the practical one never happen. ' ' eu' ' he will be always a slave. We will be always enslaved Nothing more than one joguete (or joguetes), at the hands of strange, unknown forces, a time that ignored, ' ' propositalmente' ' , to if affirming the supremacy of the magical thought: I trust, I I believe, I I can, I I go We trust. We can We go Without the conditions are analyzed so that such occurs. What it is deplorable. truily a pity


It was observed that the participants of Group G2CA had assumen themselves of a scientific writing not cited by group G1CA. The results also demonstrate that it had a change of conceptions of the participants with regard to the localization of the molecule of the DNA where the participants of Group G2CA cite the cells with 58% and in group G1CA she was cited the personal characteristics with 66%. The activities on DNA of the banana as well as the construction of models that demonstrate the structure of the molecule of the DNA had contributed for the change of these conceptions. The participants had also assumen themselves of concepts as blood and wires of hair that had been very probably influenced by the media on the current tests of paternity and based criminalsticos examinations in the analysis of extracted DNA of the blood, involved wires of hair and other fabrics (Pedrancini, 2007). The participants of two groups G1CA and G2CA had cited the paternity identification as important tool of the DNA in the current days what she validates the idea of that the conceptions of the participants had been influenced by the notice propagated for the media. Related questions the importance gnica mutation disclose that participants of Group G1CA were unaware of this subject where the majority of the participants did not know to answer this question.

The developed theoretician-practical activities in the research had promoted the change of conception of the participants of Group G2CA with regard to the agreement on gnica mutation where if they had appropriated of concepts as ' ' Improvement of the Alimentos' ' cited with 44% of frequency and ' ' Transformation in the Gene' ' with 28% of frequency. These activities had changed the conception of the participants with regard to questions related to the Gnica Mutation. In its positionings on what they understood for transgnicos it was cited by the participants of two groups, G1CA with the 100% of frequency and G2CA with 50% of frequency concept ' ' alterations plants and alimentos' '.